KONSEP MISKIN DALAM LUKAS-KISAH PARA RASUL

  • Armand Barus STT Amanat Agung
Keywords: Injil Lukas, Kisah Para Rasul, tradisi L, tradisi Q, Kesatuan Lukas-Kisah Para Rasul, miskin.

Abstract

Abstrak: Kemiskinan dalam Injil Lukas-Kisah Para Rasul seharusnya tidak dipahami sebagai kemiskinan rohani atau kemiskinan sosial atau kemiskinan moral. Kemiskinan dalam Injil Lukas-Kisah Para Rasul merujuk kepada kemiskinan ekonomi. Kesimpulan demikian diperoleh melalui perbandingan narasi unik dalam Lukas, narasi dalam Lukas dan Matius, dan narasi dalam Lukas, Matius, dan Markus. Lukas kemudian mendemonstrasikan dalam kitab Kisah Para Rasul bagaimana jemaat Kristen perdana memberi perhatian serius terhadap orang miskin materi. Kesatuan Injil Lukas-Kisah Para Rasul masih tetap dipertahankan meski konsep miskin yang dominan dalam Injil Lukas absen di dalam Kisah Para Rasul.

Kata Kunci: Injil Lukas, Kisah Para Rasul, tradisi L, tradisi Q, kesatuan Lukas-Kisah Para Rasul, miskin.

 

Abstract: Poverty in Luke-Acts should not be understood as spiritual or social or moral poverty. Poor people in Luke-Acts refer to the economically poor. This conclusion is reached through comparing narration unique to Luke, narrations in Luke and Matthew, and narrations in Luke, Matthew, and Mark. Luke then demonstrates in Acts how early Christian church seriously gave attention to the economically poor people. Unity Luke-Acts can be sustained although the concept of poverty which is dominant in Luke is absent in Acts.

Keyword: Luke, Acts, L tradition, Q tradition, Unity Luke-Acts, poor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Daftar Pustaka

Buku

Barrett, C.K. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles: Preliminary Introduction and Commentary on Acts 1-14. Vol. 1. The International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994.

Bock, Darrell L. A Theology of Luke and Acts: Biblical Theology of the New Testaments. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2012.

———. Acts. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007.

Bosch, David J. Transforming Mission: Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission. Maryknoll: Orbis Book, 1991.

Bovon, François. Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1-9:50. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2002.

———. Luke 2: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 9:51-19:27. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2013.

Bruce, F. F. The Book of Acts. Revised. The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans, 1988.

Bultmann, Rudolf. "Perilypos." Disunting oleh Gerhard Kittel. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. IV. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1967.

Burridge, Richard A. Imitating Jesus: An Inclusive Approach to New Testament Ethics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007.

Christopher, Dany. "The Appropriation of Passover in Luke-Acts." Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2 476 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018).

Ferguson, Everett. Backgrounds of Early Christianity. Edisi ke-3. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003.

Fitzmyer, S.J., Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke I-IX: Introduction, Translation, and Notes. The Anchor Bible 28. New York: Doubleday, 1981.

Friedrich, Hauck. "Euangelizomai." Disunting oleh Gerhard Kittel. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1964.

Green, Joel B. The Theology of the Gospel of Luke. New Testament Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

_____________, dan Scot McKnight, ed. "L Tradition." Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1992.

_____________, ed. "Q." Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1992.

Huck, Albert, dan Heinrich Greeven. Synopse der drei ersten Evangelien. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1981.

Kim, Kyoung-Jin. Stewardship and Almsgving in Luke’s Theology. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 155. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998.

Maccini, Robert Gordon. Her Testimony is True: Women as Witnesses According to John. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 125. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.

Marshall, I. Howard. Luke: Historian and Theologian. Edisi ke-3. Carlisle: Paternoster Press, 1988.

________________. The Acts of the Apostles: An Introduction and Commentary. The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980.

________________. The Gospel of Luke: A Commentary on the Greek Text. The New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1978.

Matera, Frank J. New Testament Ethics: The Legacies of Jesus and Paul. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1996.

Roth, S. John. The Blind, the Lame, and the Poor: Character Types in Luke-Acts. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 144. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997.

Turner, Max. "Luke and the Spirit: Renewing Theological Interpretation of Biblical Pneumatology." Dalam Reading Luke: Interpretation, Reflection, Formation. Disunting oleh Craig G. Bartholomew, Joel B. Green, dan Anthony C. Thiselton, 267-93. Scripture and Hermeneutics Series. Milton Keynes: University of Gloucestershire, 2005.

Jurnal

Co, Ma. Anicia B. "Luke’s Good News to the Poor: Ambiguities and Challenges." Landas 28, No. 1 (2014): 59-89.

Scheffler, Eben. "Caring for the Needy in the Acts of the Apostles." Neotestamentica 50, No. 3 (2016): 131-65.

Webster, Jane S. "That One Might Not Fall: A New Testament Theology of Food." Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 67, No. 4 (2013): 363-73.

Published
2021-06-02
How to Cite
Barus, A. (2021). KONSEP MISKIN DALAM LUKAS-KISAH PARA RASUL. Jurnal Amanat Agung, 16(2), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.47754/jaa.v16i2.465