Duties of Author

1. Authors must provide information about their research process and results to the editor honestly, clearly, and thoroughly and keep their research data stored appropriately and safely. The research must have the principles of scientific work and contain reliable references so that other people can develop the research. The editor does not accept any form of cheating.
2. The author must ensure that the manuscript sent/submitted to the editor is original, written by himself, sourced from his own ideas/ideas, and not plagiarizing other people's writings or ideas/ideas. The author is strictly prohibited from changing the name of the cited reference to someone else's name. Authors must also use proper citation/citation procedures.
3. The author must inform that the manuscript sent/submitted to the editor is a manuscript that has never been submitted/submitted to other journal publishers. If it is found that the same manuscript is also sent to other publishers, the editor will reject the manuscript sent by the author.
4. The author is the person who has made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation, and interpretation of the article. All those who have contributed significantly are listed as co-authors. The associated author must ensure that all co-authors have been included in the text and that all co-authors must mutually agree on the manuscript to be submitted.
5. Authors must understand the ethics of scientific publication above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties so that manuscripts can be well processed.
6. The author must immediately inform the editor if an error is found in the writing of the manuscript, both the results of the review and the edits. These writing errors include writing names, affiliations/agencies, quotations, and other writings that can reduce the meaning and substance of the text. If that happens, the author must immediately propose improvements to the manuscript.

Duties of Editor

1. The editor has the authority to accept, reject, or request a revision to the manuscript the author has submitted based on the reviewers' input. The editor's work is based on the journal's editorial team policies and is determined by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright, and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors in making this decision.
2. The editor conducts an initial review to test the originality and conformity with the journal's scope and style of the journal. The editor ensures that the peer-review process is conducted fairly and judiciously. The editor must send the manuscript to the reviewers according to their expertise and free from conflicts of interest. The editor must ensure the implementation of the double-blind peer review process.
3. The editor must be objective, neutral, and honest in editing manuscripts, regardless of gender, ethnicity, religion, race, inter-group, and nationality of the author.
4. The editor must keep confidential information about manuscripts submitted by authors, especially those related to the author's privacy data and the distribution of the manuscript.
5. The editor must be free from any form of conflict of interest.

Duties of Reviewer

1. Reviewers help editors decide and help writers improve the quality of the manuscript.
2. Every manuscript submitted by the author must be kept confidential. Reviewers may not show or discuss the author's manuscript with others unless authorized by the editor.
3. Reviewers must respond to manuscripts sent by the editor and work according to the set review time (maximum of one month). If the assigned reviewers have obstacles or require additional time to review the manuscript, they must immediately report (confirm) to the editor.
4. Reviewers must be honest, objective, unbiased, and independent. The manuscript is reviewed professionally without any conflicting interest or influence from other parties. Reviewers must provide notes on the manuscript with clear arguments.
5. Reviewers must ensure that the references used in the manuscript are appropriate and credible (accountable). Suppose an error or deviation is found in writing a reference/citation source. In that case, the reviewer must immediately inform the editor of corrections to be made by the author according to notes from the reviewers.
6. Reviewers must keep the matter being assessed confidential, not take personal advantage of the papers being assessed, and have the enthusiasm to improve the papers they have reviewed.
7. Reviewers must provide recommendations on the review results based on a predetermined assessment system.
8. Reviewers must provide critical, constructive, and objective notes for each recommendation.